珍重再见 - Last message from Chengyaw
May 21st, 2007
这是孙振耀在HP的最后一封邮件了:
to:HP China all employees
re: 珍重再见
各位同事,
这是真正说再见的时候。五月二十二日是我在中国惠普办公室的最后一天,之后我将……last message from Chengyaw
“在HP工作的经历、与大家共事15年的日子是我一生中最美好的回忆……“ 我相信这是在离开一家为之工作了15年的公司之际的有感而发,15年对个人来说不是一个小数字,对IT业来讲更不是一个短暂的时间。
No Comments » | Category: Uncategorized
商业领导测试
May 15th, 2007
针对现代商业领导的“算命”–
Can a Test Identify
Business Leaders?By KELLY SPORS
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street JournalFrom The Wall Street Journal Online
Question: We design programs for women who are considering becoming entrepreneurs. Is there a test or some assessment tool that I can use in our training program to help people figure out if they’re well-suited to own a business?
– Fran Reinstein, White Plains, N.Y.
Answer: There are plenty of tests out there to help people determine if they’re good candidates for starting a business. But whether a test can really gauge who does and doesn’t make a capable entrepreneur is a subject of debate.
Many experts say there are some personality traits common among successful entrepreneurs, like the tendency to have a higher risk tolerance, drive and resiliency to overcome failure than the general population.
Author Bill Wagner offers an “Entrepreneur IQ” test at his Web site, TheEntrepreneurNextDoor.com, that compares your answers to those of others.
Another test, created by a Harvard University professor who developed a psychological profile of entrepreneurs, is available free of charge at The Wall Street Journal’s StartupJournal.com.
The Strong and MBTI Entrepreneur Report, offered through career advisers and some sites, couples results on the Myers-Briggs test, a personality test used by career counselors, with your entrepreneurial aptitude.
But not everyone agrees there is an entrepreneurial personality type. Patricia Greene, provost of Babson College, a Wellesley, Mass., college known for its entrepreneurship program, doesn’t believe there is a test that can accurately predict if someone is entrepreneurial material. You have extroverts and introverts, and people with all types of educational backgrounds becoming successful entrepreneurs. The only real distinguishing trait, she says, seems to be self-efficacy — confidence that you can build a successful business.
Email your comments to cjeditor@dowjones.com.
No Comments » | Category: Uncategorized
精神的魅力
May 10th, 2007
正在看BTV的《搜城记》,听到了一个新鲜词–“游学北大”。提到了所谓的”精神的魅力“,北大真正吸引人的地方。
No Comments » | Category: Uncategorized
孔子与弗洛伊德
May 7th, 2007
早晨起来无意中翻出了一本岳麓书社送的书《费孝通晚年思想录–文化的传统与创造》,读了一会儿。由于我一贯的天马行空的看书习惯(从来都不是从头到尾的细细读来),倒是其中一段非正文的内容(一小段照片的图注)引起了我的兴趣,因为它提到了人的心态关系,提到了孔子与弗洛伊德以及心态的关系及其变化由谁来研究。
现在走到小康的路子是已经清楚了。我已经认识到必须及时多想想小康之后我们的路子应当怎样走下去。小康之后人与自然的关系的变化不可避免地要引起人与人的关系的变化,进到人与人之间怎样相处的问题。这个层次应当高于生态关系。在这里我想提出一个新的名词,称之为人的心态关系。心态探究必然会跟生态研究提到我们的日程上来。生态和心态有什么区别呢?我么常说共存共荣,共存是生态,共荣是心态。共存不一定共荣,因为共存固然是共荣的条件,不等于共荣。
人们的心态正在发生着变化。心态的关系及其变化由谁来研究?目前,文艺界正在接触这个问题,作家们用小说的体裁来表现人们的心态,但还没有上升到科学化的程度。怎样上升到科学化?弗洛伊德作出了尝试,但他却从“病态”来研究人的心态,这是从反面来探索的路子。我们需要从正面来研究,谁来研究?过去是孔夫子。他从正面研究心态,落入了封建人伦关系而拔不出来,从实际出发而没有能超越现实。他的背景是春秋战国时代,那是中国古代的战国时代。现在世界正在进入一个全球性的战国时代,是一个更大规模的战国时代,这个时代在呼唤着新的孔子,一个比孔子心怀更开阔的大手笔。
书中的另一图注,P136:
“志在富民”是不够的,还有一个“富了怎么办”的问题。我是看到这个问题的,但是究竟已跨过了老年界限,留着这问题给后来者去多考虑考虑,做出较好的答案吧。
费孝通:《八十自语》(1989)